Currently supported versions: Windows 10 22H2 - Windows 11 25H2 (x64)
Full size
Malware may be deployed through remote access using credentials exposed in a breach, insider-launched malware, an undisclosed 0-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-53770), or triggered accidentally by an employee without malicious intent.
When a ransomware attack is launched, endpoint security that cannot respond to these attacks in real time is, in this situation, is about as useful as having no protection at all. A malware backed by a state actor will, of course, reboot the device, effectively rendering the efforts of the cyberattack investigation team arriving on site almost entirely useless. Detection-based security does not recognize nor protect against unknowns, including new malware. Unknowns are only discovered and addressed by legacy detection-response (EDR) endpoint security providers once it has done damage to their clients.
Full size
Should the threat actor’s mission be to discreetly extract all data valuable for industrial espionage, the applications will not execute due to being absent from the allowlist. This action instantly generates a real-time alert, and the device is immediately isolated from the network as a precautionary measure.
This kind of malware deletes the logs and then renders the device unbootable. In such a situation, the only effective solution is the zero-trust mode. That means no unknown code — including digitally signed code — is executed within the company until a designated person has tested and verified it as safe.
By intercepting all unknown code at the kernel level in real time, these attack vectors are neutralized — eliminating both risk and reputational damage. This approach is particularly suited for small businesses (SMBs) lacking the budget for comprehensive round-the-clock SOC services.
Additional features includes advanced malware analysis and memory forensics. In malware analysis mode, hardly any threat goes undetected. This implementation corners the malware in its analysis mode and forces it to reveal itself. The anomaly detection feature preemptively blocks the execution of the process and flags it for manual analysis. As proactive measures, it can capture a real-time memory dump from both kernel and user space.
If your organization mostly uses Microsoft software or just a few other sofwares. This is the perfect solution. Simplicity is key. Nothing runs without an approval. The designated person or team adds them to the allowed list in Zero Trust mode. With the Home Edition, you stay in control — only the programs you approve can run. Nothing happens behind your back, ensuring complete transparency and peace of mind.
Proactivity refers to the ability to respond when an anomaly is detected on a device. In the example case, unknown code is executed on a device — code that has never previously run on any company system. The solution then performs a predefined action. For instance, as a precautionary measure, take a memory dump from the device or isolate it from the network.
Real-time threat prevention in code-signed malware that exploits previously undisclosed zero-day vulnerabilities
Malware signed with a legitimate and valid code signing certificate poses a unique challenge because it can appear trustworthy to endpoint protection systems. These threats must not be allowed to execute until they are explicitly verified as safe. In practice, only a zero-trust mode can block such state-sponsored threats in real time. Zero-trust architecture treats all code — even signed — as untrusted until proven safe. HEX DEREF X adds a critical layer of proactivity by checking whether the same code is running on any other device within the organization. This cross-device awareness helps detect lateral movement and coordinated attacks. It enables early containment before malware spreads across the network. The solution doesn’t rely solely on signature validation — it monitors behavior and presence. Zero-day vulnerabilities are flaws unknown to the vendor and unpatched at the time of attack.
The superficial protection offered by tradional antivirus solutions
A new standard: No malware, just verified execution (Zero Trust)
Case study
This simulates a real-life scenario in which an attacker has gained remote access to a company workstation using privileged administrator credentials. The attacker deploys a previously unpublished piece of malware designed for covert data exfiltration. The objective is to steal user credentials, source code, and any other valuable data that can be monetized on the dark web without the company’s awareness.
All malware variants designed to steal #1 steal #2 or wipe or encrypt data were automatically excluded from execution and subjected to manual analysis due to proactive security measures. When the Security Operations Center (SOC) conducted further testing, it quickly became evident that the file was ransomware — despite being digitally signed. This highlights the importance of layered defense and vigilant analysis.
The company emerged from the cyberattack unscathed. There were no disruptions to core operations, no reputational damage, and no need to deploy a CIRT team on-site. Sometimes a simple solution is better.
Advanced Application Control
The software enforces a Zero Trust model at the application and process level (prevention-first). No application is allowed to run unless it is on the allowlist. This helps stop previously unseen threats that exploit undisclosed zero-day vulnerabilities and, at a minimum, makes such attempts visible for investigation.
The original developer’s implementation differs significantly from competitors in one key aspect: depending on the operating mode, either the device user defines which applications are allowed — at the process level or 'globally' based on digital signatures. Execution control is enforced by designated personnel — whether a SOC lead, security architect, malware analyst, or equivalent — who explicitly approve after manual analysis what is allowed to run. Any unrecognized or unauthorized activity is quarantined and subjected to manual analysis. Only after thorough review and validation is it permitted to execute, ensuring that proactive containment is driven by human oversight.
In Zero Trust mode, applications digitally signed by Microsoft are automatically added to the allowlist.
The moment a third party defines trusted applications on behalf of a company, the design has already fundamentally failed. For example, a program signed with a certificate obtained under false pretenses, or a previously approved application that turns malicious. Naturally, the purchasing company or educational institute must have the ability to remove items from the allowlist. If for no other reason, simply because the software may no longer be in use within the organization.
It’s worth noting that processes or DLL's can be added individually to the allowlist or based on the certificate signer.
Malware analysis
One of the most important capabilities is that processes remain visible in the process list together with their command-line arguments and network connection history, even after the process has terminated or the network connection has been closed. This significantly improves visibility into suspicious activity and can help uncover previously undetected attacks, including those leveraging zero-day vulnerabilities. Because all of this information is available within a single interface in malware analysis mode, threat hunters gain a comprehensive view of system activity from one centralized location.
- Displays all running processes and their network connections
- Ensures that unauthorized or suspicious software cannot operate undetected
- Empowers CIRT teams during on-site investigations to instantly identify potential malware or anomalous activity
- The system lists only newly initiated processes and their corresponding network connections, allowing immediate visibility into potential command-and-control (C2) communications
- The solution logs all processes along with their command lines and network connections into the database. This supports the investigation of potential data breaches and malware analysis
- Even without malware analysis mode activated, this solution enables post-incident verification to determine whether your company was exposed to a potential data breach
- Your malware analysts are as good as the softwares they use
In certain scenarios, a straightforward approach can outperform complex AI-driven solutions.
What can the on-site CIRT team can do if the malware securely removes itself from the device and restarts it? Not much except send the invoice. If this solution is running in a zero-trust mode, you won’t need them anyway, because the attack stops at the first compromised device.
If a cyberattack does occur, and backups have been restored, but the root cause remains unknown at the endpoint level, this kind of cyber threat mitigation solution needs to be deployed on the device in order to determine the root cause. Moreover, this kind of system is well-suited for hunting new threats. With this solution, you minimize or completely prevent the following effects: financial losses, reputational damage, operational disruptions caused by malware — and regulatory fines under frameworks like NIS2.
Key features (No comparable solution with these features can be found through search engines):
- Competes easily with enterprise-grade solutions such as CrowdStrike Falcon Enterprise by providing comprehensive kernel-level visibility into Windows systems
- https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/pricing/falcon-pro/ — https://assets.crowdstrike.com/is/content/crowdstrikeinc/falcon-endpoint-protection-pro-data-sheetpdf — CrowdStrike Falcon Pro keeps detection details for 90 days, but not the full raw process, command-line, registry, and network telemetry unless the customer enables FDR (Falcon Data Replicator).
- It can easily compete with ESET Elite Protection. Based on their pricing, this solution could be marketed at a similar price point — https://www.eset.com/us/business/elite-protection/
- Full access to process command-line and network telemetry, without vendor-imposed retention limits
- Threat hunting
- Early attack chain disruption
- Prevent ransomware attacks and data breaches before they even have a chance to begin—even when the threat originates from within the organization
- Zero Trust - In this security-enhanced mode, the system implements strict execution controls that block all code from running without the user’s deliberate initiation or explicit consent (excluding Microsoft-digitally-signed processes). Everything else is blocked by default and flagged as an anomaly for manual analysis. Not even an APT-level ransomware or spyware can cause any damage. Although a process or its digital signature may be whitelisted, its behavior is continuously monitored to detect any potential malicious activity that may emerge over time
- Advanced process protection: Processes can be protected at the kernel level based on their digital signature, ensuring: Process memory cannot be read or written from user space. Protected processes are immune to code injection. By configuring the settings, browser processes can be secured in such a way that even fileless malware cannot hide within them. Most importantly, it prevents the extraction of user credentials or other sensitive information from browser memory
- The attack surface is minimized to a near-zero level
- Anomaly detection flags any deviation. Zero-day threats are neutralized before they can act — because they’re not on the allowlist
- Advanced malware analysis and memory forensics
- Designed to accelerate root cause analysis, the solution enables rapid identification and resolution of system anomalies, minimizing downtime and enhancing operational resilience
- Kernel physical memory scanner
- User-mode memory scanner, including WinTcb protected processes
- Secure IOCTL communication (The Exploitation #1 and Exploitation #2 mentioned in the article is not possible with this protection)
- A Next Generation Anti-Virus (NGAV) goes beyond traditional antivirus solutions – no signature updates, no reboots, and operates seamlessly even offline
- The solution runs alongside existing endpoint protections and kernel-level anti-cheats, while also providing deep visibility into their behavior
- Proactive nature - After detecting an anomaly, it can automatically capture a memory dump from kernel memory or user-space memory based on predefined actions or isolate the device from the network where the anomaly was detected. This enables an immediate forensic analysis without requiring on-site teams
- Always-on, real-time defense at the kernel level because threats never sleep
- Protected Folders (ransomware and data theft protection)
- Protected Folders (ransomware and data theft protection)
- Detects privilege escalation
The solution logs all processes along with their command lines and network connections into the database. This supports the investigation of potential data breaches and malware analysis.
The allowed applications list is maintained by the device user. This can be tailored through software development to suit your organization’s requirements.
The user interface (UI) has been coded with C# .NET 8.0 so that the project would be easier to customize and be more easily modifiable.
This solution does not require or use any third-party additional protection layers. Therefore, the kernel driver is stable, and the source code is maintainable and well-documented.
Advanced memory scanner
Detects and exposes all processes (including WinTcb protected) accessing user credentials in real time. Instantly flags any activity involving the exfiltration of sensitive data. You'll be astonished by what it uncovers — threats you didn't even know existed.
Unauthorized credential access by antivirus or endpoint protection software or kernel-level anti-cheat? This solution ensures it's detected — no exceptions. No search engine reveals a memory scanner like this — there’s nothing remotely similar to compare results with.
Availability of the source code
- Can be licensed on a non-exclusive basis for internal corporate use
- Is sold as commercial software development work on a non-exclusive basis, as-is at the time of purchase
- Provides a solid foundation for developing kernel-level anti-cheat mechanisms on Windows with relative ease
- A process monitoring driver
- A file-system filter driver
- A registry filter driver
- A handle monitoring driver
Investors
No team, no budget, just one developer, White Byte
, turning zero into something remarkable.
- Combines multiple critical malware analysis tools into a single product
- Performs all operations at the kernel level (including a custom driver)
- High compatibility with the broader analysis-tool ecosystem
- No direct competitor; the closest comparison is System Informer, but HEX DEREF X provides broader functionality and deeper kernel-level integration
If a telecom operator acquired the HEX DEREF X: Endpoint Security source code through a non-exclusive software-development agreement, it would retain 100% of the revenue generated by the solution while reducing its reliance on third-party cybersecurity vendors. Instead of paying external vendors for endpoint security capabilities, the operator could offer its own proactive security service directly to customers. The commercial opportunity extends beyond enterprise customers. Many consumers would likely be willing to pay an additional fee as part of their mobile subscription for a proactive security solution that delivers capabilities not commonly available even in many enterprise-grade endpoint security products. This would allow operators such as Elisa, Telia, or DNA to improve cybersecurity, strengthen customer loyalty, differentiate their services from competitors, and create a new recurring revenue stream. A telecom operator could also act as a reseller for its business customers.
- Cyber Security Analyst
- SOC Analysts
- Malware Analysts
- Security Researchers
- Security Engineers
- Reverse Engineers
- Threat Hunters
- Red team / blue team professionals
- IDA PRO users
- Security laboratories and SOC teams
- Cybersecurity companies requiring deep analysis and kernel-level visibility
- An EV code-signing certificate
- A registered company to obtain the certificate
- Potential funding for finalization, marketing, and documentation
An EV code-signing certificate is required to register an organization with Microsoft's Hardware Developer Program and to establish its identity within the Hardware Partner Center. The certificate is associated with the organization's Partner Center account and is a prerequisite for submitting kernel-mode drivers for Microsoft signing. In that sense, the EV certificate effectively serves as an organizational identity credential for accessing Microsoft's hardware signing infrastructure. The certificate itself does not necessarily have to be used to sign the driver submitted to Microsoft, although Microsoft recommends using an EV certificate for individual submissions.
- A unique product with no direct competitor
- High market potential as cybersecurity demand grows
- Deep technology ideal for early-stage VC investors — the product is based on rare, technically demanding expertise that is difficult to replicate and provides a clear competitive advantage
- A functional minimum viable product (MVP) already exists
- Opportunity to build a company that offers endpoint protection, malware analysis tools, and kernel-level anti-cheat technology through a single unified Windows platform
- As a byproduct of the Anti-malware implementation, I also have an in-development kernel-level anti-cheat system (core functionality implemented and tested) HEX DEREF X - ANTI-CHEAT
The United States June 2024 ban on the sale and distribution of Kaspersky cybersecurity products highlighted a broader strategic issue: endpoint security solutions operate with highly privileged access and have visibility into virtually all activity occurring on an endpoint. As a result, trust in the vendor and the organization behind the product becomes a critical component of the overall risk profile.
Simply auditing third-party software does not, by itself, solve this challenge. A more meaningful long-term strategy would be to develop domestic expertise and technology. The HEX DEREF X source code could provide a foundation for a Finnish-developed endpoint security solution, malware analysis platform, and a Windows kernel-level anti-cheat technology capable of competing easily with established international products such as Easy Anti-Cheat and BattlEye.
